Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Offical 5.1 helping thread
Offical 5.1 helping thread
Jul 21 2010, 11:15 am
By: Devourer
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 519 >
 

Jul 22 2010, 12:45 am rockz Post #41

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

I tend to leave out unnecessary information and only ask specific questions relevant to my goals. Perhaps I should change my ways so that people who think they are intelligent will answer my simple questions rather than throw out pointless insults or comment on something other than what I asked. Glad you got a laugh though, because I laugh at everything you say, unless you've said it before.
Quote from Demented Shaman
But why the hell can't the same green that I see on the skin and forum be used in those contact buttons. :-_-:
my point exactly, except in the form of a question, not a statement, and for all colors.

tileable banner background for you.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jul 22 2010, 1:08 am BlueWolf Post #42



I think where the time a post was written.. that bar or w/e should have another bar under it, but at a lighter color. I tried doing an example, but I'm not so good with ubuntu's drawing program.



None.

Jul 22 2010, 1:09 am Devourer Post #43

Hello

For what reason? :ermm:



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Jul 22 2010, 1:12 am rockz Post #44

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

what, GIMP?




"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jul 22 2010, 1:14 am Demented Shaman Post #45



Quote from BlueWolf
I think where the time a post was written.. that bar or w/e should have another bar under it, but at a lighter color. I tried doing an example, but I'm not so good with ubuntu's drawing program.
Awful idea, last thing this skin needs is useless lines running across it.



None.

Jul 22 2010, 3:17 am poison_us Post #46

Back* from the grave

Can MZ provide the online icon, minus the text, and the font used for it (aka backgrond and font)? I noticed something that I can't describe well enough to explain.




Jul 22 2010, 3:25 am MadZombie Post #47



Balls. Sorry I didn't save the PSD. The font is Constantia if I'm not mistaken. I don't know if this will answer whatever it is you wanted to know but I apply a sharpen filter before saving the image. I do it for almost anything. I just had a feeling that might have been it.



None.

Jul 22 2010, 3:36 am poison_us Post #48

Back* from the grave

Well crap. Background would've been nice. Oh well, I'll manage. Uhm, real quick: compression is your friend. Online.png = 4,584 bytes, can be compressed to 1,928 bytes, 57.94% compression...




Jul 22 2010, 3:40 am MadZombie Post #49



Not to sound like a jerk but it wasn't my priority. It's not my bandwidth. If they really wanted to save the extra kb's they could of done it themselves. It's all as is ;]



None.

Jul 22 2010, 4:28 am rockz Post #50

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

Quote from poison_us
Well crap. Background would've been nice. Oh well, I'll manage. Uhm, real quick: compression is your friend. Online.png = 4,584 bytes, can be compressed to 1,928 bytes, 57.94% compression...
Is that all you got?





I was going to tell you to save the psd so we could make other colors from it. Instead I assumed you'd save it.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jul 22 2010, 5:06 am poison_us Post #51

Back* from the grave

Meh. Did my best, turns out MZ used Arial 12 instead of Constantia. Tell me things I could fix, like I just noticed that his fades, while mine desaturates.




EDIT: The one below should mesh better with MZ's fade. Redid the "x" as well, I like the older one better now, but filesize dropped as a little bonus. Not like it matters much, just a couple hundred bytes. Gonna redo the "x" to match the first, it looks better than my hand-drawn BS.

EDIT 2: Alright, now the X is fine, and the gradient is more noticeable. Lemme know what you guys think.


Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Jul 22 2010, 5:42 am by poison_us.




Jul 22 2010, 6:03 am DevliN Post #52

OVERWATCH STATUS GO

Quote from rockz
Quote from poison_us
Well crap. Background would've been nice. Oh well, I'll manage. Uhm, real quick: compression is your friend. Online.png = 4,584 bytes, can be compressed to 1,928 bytes, 57.94% compression...
Is that all you got?





I was going to tell you to save the psd so we could make other colors from it. Instead I assumed you'd save it.
Those look great. We do need a "Banned" as well.



\:devlin\: Currently Working On: \:devlin\:
My Overwatch addiction.

Jul 22 2010, 12:19 pm rockz Post #53

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

MZ told you he sharpened it.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Jul 22 2010, 1:33 pm poison_us Post #54

Back* from the grave

Woops, forgot to sharpen and mess the pixels up :rolleyes: Anyways, MZ should probably get on making a banned png.




Jul 22 2010, 1:34 pm Demented Shaman Post #55



Quote
Made a new set


Let me know which one you guys think is better. And I mean between the two sets I made.



None.

Jul 22 2010, 1:37 pm poison_us Post #56

Back* from the grave

MadZombie's. Of yours, either the first, or the second with stuff added in to fill some of the "empty" space.




Jul 22 2010, 1:44 pm NudeRaider Post #57

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Quote from Demented Shaman
Quote
Made a new set


Let me know which one you guys think is better. And I mean between the two sets I made.
And how are any of these better than the current ones? The current ones just need to be a bit darker and more saturated and they'd look fine.

But to answer your question, the 2nd set is less bad than the first.
And no, SEN will not become a comic-y caricature of your sigs, so you can as well cut the crap right now.




Jul 22 2010, 1:57 pm Demented Shaman Post #58



Quote from NudeRaider
Quote from Demented Shaman
Quote
Made a new set


Let me know which one you guys think is better. And I mean between the two sets I made.
And how are any of these better than the current ones? The current ones just need to be a bit darker and more saturated and they'd look fine.
I think they're better, because they're nice solid colors without random crap in them and they actually fit the rest of the forum.


Like what are those lines in the corner? I don't even know what that's supposed to do for the look of the button
But what's worse is the fact that lines on the contact button aren't even consistent in look with the online button

They just look half-assed and poorly executed



None.

Jul 22 2010, 1:58 pm Devourer Post #59

Hello

matter of taste, but I also prefer Mad's :)



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Jul 22 2010, 2:19 pm Demented Shaman Post #60







None.

Options
Pages: < 1 2 3 4 519 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[12:30 am]
ClansAreForGays -- When you join a pub lobby because you see 7/8 players, but then realize host is bating you with computers. :flamer: :flamer:
[2024-10-30. : 11:48 pm]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- :wob:
[2024-10-30. : 6:24 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2024-10-29. : 4:33 pm]
Vrael -- :wob:
[2024-10-29. : 1:32 pm]
Zoan -- :wob:
[2024-10-28. : 5:21 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2024-10-27. : 4:34 pm]
jjf28 -- :wob:
[2024-10-27. : 9:01 am]
Zycorax -- :wob:
[2024-10-27. : 3:31 am]
RIVE -- :wob:
[2024-10-26. : 7:12 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: lil-Inferno